Ethical Issues During Louis XIV Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

honorable Issues During Louis XIV - Research Paper ExampleSpitting or scratching oneself at a circuit card especially during meals is strongly discouraged save if at all one has to then he or she should do it politely and unnoticed. The above-mentioned laws are not immutable, they can be changed. For example in superannuated times one could yawn, provided he or she did not speak in the process but instantly it could be shoc magnate to a person of rank. Spitting frequently is very much disagreeable but when there is need one should conceal it as much. When one spits he has to cover the saliva with the foot. When in the theater a handkerchief should be used instead while turning aside. Care should be taken especially when spitting so as not to spit on ones clothes or those of others (Corey 78). One should not only spit in a handkerchief while in the house but also when in church and in places where cleanliness controls. It is an inexcusable habit for children to spit in their pla ymates faces. also it is a bad habit to spit out of windows, on furniture and on walls. A serial publication of quotations on spitting clearly shows that there has been a change in behavior towards a peculiar(a) direction since the Middle Ages. Frequent spitting is still being faceed as unpleasant behavior and deprivation of cleanliness unlike it was seen almost four centuries ago. This clearly demonstrates how the civilization process has taken place (Hernandez 89). Taboos and restrictions of different kinds view ejection of saliva not as any other natural process but as a primitive and uncivilized. The distinguishing fact between the former and the latter is that the former views this as an away constraint while the latter sees it as an internal constraint (Lama 89). Elias asserts that even Louis fourteen, who mostly is seen as the self-governing among the omnipotent absolute monarch, proofs when scrutinized as a person whose rank as a king was in a certain network of interd ependencies (Barrat 101). He preserved his power by a carefully mensurable strategy which was under a peculiar structure of court rescript and by the society at large. Elias understood Louis xiv in the sense of light-recentre-thinking on the nature and structure of the French absolute monarchy. The personalised rule of Louis xiv started in 1661, a time of great weakness when all the opposition was crushed. Louis xiv seemed to use the old Roman adage as the simplest strategy for his rule but he did not. From the go through of the Fronde, the king knew that his ruler was under pressure of threats from below. Barrat asserts that to maintain his rule and avoid the unification of the court society against him, Louis had to exert more pressure (100). His genius, from Elias, was that he rose to perfection as a result of the careful assessment of the relationship of power at the court and the balancing of tension that was within it. He, therefore, succeeded by creating organizations whi ch not only maintained the tension and the differences but also facilitated supervision. Louis xiv calculated strategy was implemented during his closure to fifty-five years of personal reign. During the period he succeeded in maintaining his rank as a king and instilling the need for it in the French nobility. The king had to use all means at his government to maintain and enhance his power. The court and the etiquette as understood by the king were the most important instruments for his reign and power distribution.