Friday, May 17, 2019

Portfolio Assignment Essay

1. The assets of the three richest common riches in the world match the combined annual GDPs of the 48 poorest countries. My person-to-person thought on this statement is most closely described by a. Good for them they worked unmanageable to excite their wealthb. The only problem I redeem with this is that this currency is in their bank account and non in mine c. No problem with this many of these people give huge amounts to charities d. I cerebrate that it is virtuously wrong for anyone to sport that very much money e. I think that active steps should be taken to correct such immoral wealth imbalances picking this instant A Good for them they worked hard to get their wealth Choice in assignment 1 B The only problem I have with this is that this money is in their bank account and not mine. NotesI changed my option because I was not tumefy conversant with the word sustainability. I have learned that Sustainability is roughly what we must want to achieve. These people achieved by working hard. We must not be greed. They worked hard to achieve their desires. We all have to work hard if we need to be successful in life. I know that some leave behind say that thither should be fair distri stillion of wealth and allocation of resources among diverse members of the community (distributive justice). In reality, you cannot sit and do nothing, at the end of the month you expect to be paid like all others who worked so hard.What we have to do as a nation, we have to create a conducive environment for everyone by creating jobs, health c are centers, ensure that all children are educated for the benefit of their prospective, by this we would be creating a split up future. Inequality could not be detrimental to the interests of the poorest of the poor (Permissible inequality) John Raws. John Raws indicated that the poor do not get opportunity to go to proper schools or even better education so that their future can at least be bright, if we ensure that on that point is proper education, it would be a unspoiled foundation for the kids and these would reduce poverty and no one will complain about the salary or wealth of others.2. Unless fossil-fuel use slows dramatically, the earths average temperature could rise by six degrees Celsius in the following 100 years. My in-person opinion on this statement is most closely described by a. Who cares?b. I dont believe this humour change nonsensec. Six degrees will make winters much more(prenominal) bearable to me personally d. Im a routine concerned about this, but there is nothing that I can do about it e. Im a bit concerned about this, but why should I invest my personal time, effort or money in solving a general social problem. f. I think that individually we can and should extend to solve this problem for the greater good Choice nowChoice in assignment 1 F I think that individually we can and should strive to solve this problem for the greater good. NotesIm still picking option F because I have learned that when the temperature rises, there is a higher chance of di seases being transmitted through insects. One disease that was spread throughout the unite States and Canada because of heat append was the West Nile virus. Other animals such as rats might change their habitats in baking hot weather and can cause the spread of diseases. This is how the disease Hantavirus is transmitted. Heat waves can cause droughts. As a result, water levels decrease, lowering water quality and increasing the opportunity for disease transmission. Heat waves also attach health problems in humans. Average surface temperature will increase. Sea level will rise from resolve ice around the world. This could be as much as a meter, or much more if melting accelerates or destabilizes major ice sheets (there is unexpected and recent evidence of Greenland and West Antarctica becoming destabilized.) resolve or destabilization of either could raise sea level world-wide by 25 feet. D eaths will increase as a result of heat waves, drought, and flooding.We have to begin to strive to solve this problem now as it takes time to lower concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, individual and collective action communities, states, nations, businesses and government are needed. We have to learn about our carbon footprint and how to reduce it by wasting less capability and pushing for solutions that would reduce carbon emissions per unit of energy utilize. The less fossil fuels used the better.Sources Heat Waves and Unusually Warm Weather. 8/10/05. Union of Concerned Science. 12/23/05. http//www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/ knowledge/early-warning-signs-of-global-warming-heat-waves.html Consequences of Global Warming. 1/3/06. NaturalDefense Resource Council. 12/23/05. http//www.nrdc.org/globalWarming/fcons.asp3. If the present result trends in world population, industrialization, pollution, food production, and resource depletion continue unchanged, the limi ts to growth on this planet will be reached sometime within the next one hundred years. The most probable result will be a rather sudden and uncontrollable decline in both population and industrial capacity. My personal opinion on this statement is most closely described by a. I dont believe this tale of doom.b. Yes we are consuming native resources too fast, but I dont think this is a problem as there is plenty of time to find technological solutions to problems that come in c. Yes we are consuming natural resources too fast. The first priority in solving this is to effectuate the brakes on human population growth. d. Yes we are consuming natural resources too fast. The first priority in solving this is for rich people to reduce their consumption significantly. e. Yes we are consuming natural resources too fast. And frankly I dont chink any solution because increasing consumption is the basis of our economical growth. Choice nowChoice in assignment 1 B Yes we are consuming na tural resources too fast, but I do not think this is a problem as there is plenty of time to find technological solution to problems that emerge. NotesI still chose option B because I think as a human race we are up to the challenge. We have capable scientists who will come up with a solution to this problem. I think that a better world is possible, and that the betrothal of physical limits is the first step toward getting there.4. If arctic ice melting continues, we are likely to see the loss of two thirds of the worlds glacial bear population within 50 years. My personal opinion on this statement is most closely described by a. Who cares?b. If it boils down choosing between impetuous a luxury SUV and worrying aboutpolar bears Ill take the car any day. c. turn this is sad, polar bears arent really very important to my personal welfare which is my primary concern. d. spell this is sad, polar bears arent really very important to general human social welfare. e. I dont think polar bears are all that important to human welfare. However, their plight is a symptom of climate change which is a big problem to future human welfare. f. I think this it is morally impossible for humans to put their interests ahead of the rights of other species like polar bears. Choice now C While this is sad, polar bears arent really very important to my personal welfare which is my primary concern.Choice in assignment 1 F I think this is morally unacceptable for humans to put their interests ahead of the rights of other species like polar bears. NotesI dont have to worry about Polar bears because they live In the Arctic in areas where they can hunt seals at openings in the sea ice called leads. There are five nations with polar bears U.S. (Alaska), Canada, Russia, Greenland, and Norway. So, I really dont think it is necessary for me

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.